Thursday 26 April 2012

CHHARIGANGA: A BISTAAR BY SOUMITRA CHATTOPADHYAY, THE MASTER OF THE STAGE


CHHARIGANGA: A BISTAAR BY SOUMITRA CHATTOPADHYAY, THE MASTER OF THE STAGE

Way back in 1981, I remember, Soumitra Chattopadhyay in conversation with yours truly had said that before stepping on to the stage to act out a character in front of his viewers, he studies the character and he thinks about it, and then like the bistaar in a kheyal rendition he gradually unfolds the character on the stage. His words resonated after these thirty years later the other day when I had gone to see, rather experience yet another sterling work of this master of the stage.

Sanstab presented Chhariganga as their latest production with Soumitra Chattopadhyay directing the play and doing the role of the protagonist. A couple of days before the day the show was staged at Tapan Memorial Theatre, or it would be correct to say that I had the opportunity to see the staging, the central government had announced that this year’s Dada Saheb Phalke awardee would be this thespian who had gifted innumerable scintillating performances since his first shot as Apu ushering in his newly-wed wife, Aparna to his dilapidated roof-top room beside the railway yard fifty three years back. A national award for acting had come his way for the first time just four years back and that, too, after fifty two years of our sheer disregard to choose and acknowledge a gem from the coloured glass beads. This shame has been somewhat lessened by this announcement of the award. But to many theatre-goers like me Soumitra Chattopadhyay is an outright stage person who also acts in films. Unfortunately we have not given him his dues for we have failed to gauge the immense depth of his capabilities on the stage.
    
Jointly written with Amit Ranjan Biswas, the play has those poetic qualities that are the benchmarks of a Soumitra play. It tells the story of a scientist who though having international recognition is out casted because of his shifting into the field of quasi-science world of alchemy to probe into the origin of the Creation. His eccentric pursuits had led to the death of his wife and for which his daughter who lives abroad comes to him in his many feats of hallucinations and holds him responsible. Driven out from the professional and the social worlds he lives secluded in his ancestral dilapidated mansion far away from the city and on the banks of the huge Chhariganga lagoon. A person who also has a past to hide visits him to help him out in his daily chores and, thereby, giving him company at least for some part of the day. Both the characters are like the backwaters of Chhariganga – isolated from the main stream. At the end his daughter comes to take him with her and thereby release him of his bondage from isolation and dejection.  

As a drama it has not much novelty to boast off, and that makes the production much more significant. But the presentation on the stage will make the production worthy of mention as a major event on the Bengali stage. The two characters or rather three as the character of the daughter portrayed by Poulomi Bose, the thespians daughter in his real life, has two appearances – one as the real daughter of the scientist and the other as the one who comes in his hallucinations – are entwined so perfectly in the body of the play that there is no difficulty in their perspectives as against the protagonist. The role of the person who gives company to the scientist is excellently executed by the elderly stage personality, Dwijen Bandopadhyay. This senior actor has been contributing immensely to the Bengali stage for quite a number of decades and has developed a particular style of his own and it was interesting to note that in this particular character he was bereft of that style.  That proved his versatility once again. Poulomi on the other hand was immaculate in rendering the daughter’s character both in the real and surreal forms. For both the actors it is needless to say that sharing the stage with the master is a real challenge and with the directorial support from the master, himself, the work becomes a finely tuned piece.

And as for Soumitra’s presentation of the character it was an experience for the viewers as is usual in his all other works. Here he was creating a character of a man of science with outstanding intelligence but who has lost his battle to get to the truth of something he believes is at the core of existence, and is living a castigated life of a recluse. His work can best be described taking his words in reference. As a viewer one experienced the bliss of listening to a master expressively interpreting each note of the raga in the bistaar of a kheyal. As such works of art can never be emulated nor can be repeated it remains an experience of a life-time for those who witnessed the performance at that point of time. In subsequent staging, it is natural that the master would render the same dialogues but the resonance that would be created in the viewers of that performance would be something different, something unique. And so the concept of stage performance gets a very different meaning, a different connotation when such masters are on the stage. Then to top it all there is a nuance, an overtone of poetic lyricism in the structuring of sequences or moments that carry the undoubted signature of the director. For the students of theatre such works unveil a thousand texts for them to imbibe.

The other aspects have been well handled. Soumik-Piyalis’ stage design has significantly contributed to create the ambience which did help in the run of the play. So did the light design by Badal Das as darkness and the lantern lights played important roles in creating the surreal effects. Dishari’s background score was kept to the minimum. The dress designs and their colours were very well thought out. The maroon robe and the staff in his hand gave the scientist’s appearance a medieval look which certainly brought out the perspective of the character. Though Md.Ali’s make-up was well done there seemed to be some sort of discomfort for the master thespian in a few instances. But that certainly did not hamper his act.                   

What did hamper the production is the constant disturbance of the ringing of the cell phones of the so-called culturally superior viewers of Kolkata most of whom sadly had gone to see ‘Soumitra’ rather than to appreciate and dunk in the awe-inspiring performance of this great master of stage.   

No comments:

Post a Comment