Sumitkumar Roy and Palash Adhikary create a world of Wonder and Magic
The much-read
short story BHUTO by Satyajit Ray was given an outstanding
theatre treatment by ‘Kabyakala Manan o Deabantara Arts’ [KMDA] at the AFA.
The art of ventriloquism though is at the centre of the story, the eternal
conflict of the old and the new where the old denies any space for the new to
breathe, is the piece de resistance with a dollop of Ray-style mystery and a
garnishing of his style of comedy gives the story its richness of flavour. And Antara
Chatterjee has done a wonderful job in adapting this short story to a full-length
drama. Her acumen in this field had been well established in her adaptation of
Khaled Hossaini’s classic ‘The Kite Runner’ into the stage idiom. It was also
produced by this group about four years back and remains as a magnum opus in Bengali
theatre of the recent years.
Chatterjee’s imagination and her power of adaptation has given the play a wider
expanse that has very well merged with the Ray story-line. Excepting the
initial episode in the introductory scene which seemed utterly irrelevant and
which very few of the viewers would care to remember after the play is over, the
dramatist steadily builds up the play where the mystery thickens up and the
climax is reached in a perfect theatrical style. She very dexterously accelerates
the conflict between the protagonist, the greenhorn ventriloquist Naveen and
his adversary, the senior Akrur using the change of their respective spaces in
the entertainment world. The dialogues apart from the ones one comes across in
Ray’s story, have been very well written keeping the comical savor of the Ray-story.
Chatterjee’s script has been superbly translated into its stage version by Sumitkumar Roy. An excellent actor Roy
has proved himself also to be a very powerful play-maker. I have had the
privilege to witness a few of his works, but I must admit, the present work has
put Roy himself in a tight spot, in the sense that he has heightened the bar,
no doubt, to a height that would even be a challenge to any seasoned maker. The
reader might find this acclaim a bit too pompous, but one has to believe in what
one witnesses.
Roy’s
mounting of every scene speaks of the amount of thinking he had put in to essay
the scenes. He has used the physical space of the stage to portray the conflict
part. His use of the door frame is a very effective ingenious theatrical
element and somehow becomes a motif sort of, of the clash of the two persons. The
use of the flats, too, need to be applauded. He heightens the climactic portions
with a crafty design of lights and a sinister soundscape. The flight of the talking
doll Bhuto across the stage is a theatrical moment that will remain etched in
the minds of the viewers.
But the whole project could not have taken shape so exquisitely without the
outstanding performance of Palash Adhikary, one of the leading ventriloquists
of the present time, in the role of Naveen. His execution of this extraordinary
art form bowled out the spectators, as expected, lock stock and barrel. But what
intrigues one is his expertise in acting both physical as well as vocal, which
as a matter of fact was in four different voices. And that too with perfect
diction, with pauses and perfect expressions, and to top it all with perfect
modulations. The other character of Akrur was done by Abhijit Ghosh.
The lighting design was by Dipankar De, while the sets were done by Debabrata
Maity, and the background score was by Partha Pratim Roy. It is needless to
mention that these departments were the mainstay of the production. Make-up was
by Surajit Pal and dress was by Nabanita Mukherjee Das, though I have some
reservation with the look of Akrur. However, a special mention is due for
Scenographica (or is it Scenografica?) for the execution of the puppet.
It should be especially reiterated that through theatre like this one, another
performing art which is in the endangered list, like that of ventriloquism has
been given a space, and that enough is a good reason for ‘KMDA’ to get a standing
ovation.
[As a post-script note: From an
article by Robert Young, entitled ‘Ray, Ventriloquism and Illusion’, I came to
know that it is believed that Ray had seen ‘Dead of Night’, a 1945 anthology of
horror movies while in London, and the Michael Redgrave starer of a story of a
malevolent ventriloquist and his talking doll Hugo, might have been his
inspiration to write Bhuto.]
However, before ending yet again we stand in reverence to the great man and
thank KMDA for providing us with this opportunity.
Respected Subrata babu,I don't think I have any right to put forward a comment beneath YOUR write up,I don't even dare .... Still I must express my deepest gratitude for appreciating our production and us in such , beautiful,applauding language.
ReplyDelete'Bhuto' is a harvest of full one year of sweat and tears of the full team and an unimaginable budget from our production house.Our effort gets immeasurable mileage through such a well perceived,well thought and well explained critical analysis from your mighty pen.I really don't know how to thank you for coming and inspiring a new theatre group like us with your immensely valuable and significant feedback which will ever be restored by us in the deepest depth of our hearts.